Skip to main content

Opinions and the practice of medicine

I hear those terms all the time when discussing medicine, i.e. doctors practice medicine, a doctors practice and going for a second opinion.

Those and similar statements should be the first indication that something may be amiss in the field of medicine. Maybe medicine isn't an exact science, and that doctors aren't gods that know everything there is to know about treating diseases. But a recent discussion on an MCL message board I frequent, seems to indicate that, at least a few out there still believe that to be the case.

One person stated

It is my opinion that the patient must choose a doctor after obtaining all information available and even checking with several doctors ---- then after choosing a doctor in whom the patient has confidence, he or she must then submit to that doctor's recommended treatment


Another says


The saying is that if you're going to be your own d[octor] you have an idiot for a patient. ... I was introduced to a young (32, who looked 22) doctor. I asked him his age and where he was from. I was in way to much trouble to shop around. ... I've never been sorry that I didn't take the time to shop for a second opinion.


Of course I have no objections to people believing and pursuing such courses of action, but those are individual decisions that must be made by each individual on his/her own. Advocating those beliefs as gospel for everyone is dangerous.

I sure don't believe that to be sound advice. I have never been of the belief that doctors are gods, and know everything about everything. And if there are such doctors they probably work at a university/research center, and see very few patients if any.

Most doctors/oncologists/hematologists have to deal with a myriad of different cancers, diseases etc. and to expect any doctor to keep up with all the latest research in every area is naive. The only way to ensure you are receiving the best possible care is to be proactive, and keep on top of all the latest advancements related to your disease, while at the same time keeping your doctors informed. Only then can you ever be sure that you are receiving the best possible care.

And with the advent of the internet, that job has never been easier.

There was one thing I learned at the first lymphoma conference I attended in LA, in 2002, shortly after my diagnosis, which I have never forgotten, and that was

NOBODY CARES MORE ABOUT YOU THAN YOU DO!


That goes for your spouse, your parents, your siblings, your doctor, and especially anyone on those message boards.

NOTE: I also posted this at my blog over at The Medical Blog Network, hoping to solicit views from doctors.

So far I have received one comment from Steve Beller, PhD which I found very interesting. It's a little long, but he does give some reasons to be concerned.

Comments

Becky said…
You're right. It's very important that you remain proactive and research your illness whatever it may be. A year or so ago I requested a bone density scan from my dr. He stated I was too youn. Then I mentioned a recent study on epileptics and the anti-convulstants they take causing early onset that I had read about on the internet. He vaguely remembered reading/hearing about it so he requested the test. He actually thanked me and said that he would make a note to recommend the test for another patient he had who had epilepsy.


Nobody loves me like I do :-)

Popular posts from this blog

The green tea phenomenon

Despite being a heavy drinker of green tea since my diagnosis, mainly for its cancer prevention, and hopefully cancer curing qualities, I recently have developed a new found enthusiasm for green tea. Now whether it has been the green tea I have been drinking for the past 6+ years, my heavy exercise routine, or just pure chance that has kept my MCL stable, or at least [very] slow progressing, for the past 7+ years is certainly open to debate, but based on past research, I have chosen to believe green tea has at least helped to some degree. So what has given me this new found enthusiasm? Well, a friend of mine, and cycling buddy, was recently diagnosed with bladder cancer, and knowing my daily regimen called to ask my advice on green tea. He had already done a lot of research on the subject, so when I told him my obsession with green tea consisted principally of drinking the least expensive, decaffeinated green tea available (Trader Joe's brand of 18 tea bags for $3, and more recentl...

Alternative treatment blowback

I received some interesting criticism the other day for my stance on alternative therapies. I ......... cannot for the life of me understand why you would not use supplementation and then use an over the counter poisonous liquid which has proven liver toxicity. Especially while taking a statin. She was referring to the use of an over the counter cough medication, I have been taking to help ease the symptoms of my upper respiratory infection. I did this once and vow to never use it again! I have gotten off Lipitor by using Nicotinic Acid and getting much better results but still use COQ10 to protect Liver as you must do while taking Statins. If you are not using CoQ10, I urge you to research this issue. MCL reduces your D3 and should be taken everyday! I use 5000mgs a day. I was sorta taken aback. She was partially correct. I'm against taking supplements, but when necessary I don't have a problem taking over the counter medication, when my ailments finally get the better of me. ...

When is enough, enough?

Today I learned, Lance Armstrong, the most drug tested athlete in the history of sport, is being accused of doping, again . This time by the US Anti Doping Agency (USADA), who claim they have collected blood samples from him in 2009 and 2010 that were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.” Really! What took them so long? The French have been trying to make allegations of drug doping stick for years, ever since he won his first Tour d'France, but to no avail. And now the USADA claims to have evidence to support that claim, and they've waited almost 3 years before releasing this evidence. Needless to say, I am skeptical. Then there's this from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO): Increasing the federal excise tax on cigarettes by 50 cents per pack eventually would increase Medicare and Social Security spending, slightly. Eventually? What is the CBO suggesting here? That we should encourage smoking, because if we don't, in...