Skip to main content

Opinions and the practice of medicine

I hear those terms all the time when discussing medicine, i.e. doctors practice medicine, a doctors practice and going for a second opinion.

Those and similar statements should be the first indication that something may be amiss in the field of medicine. Maybe medicine isn't an exact science, and that doctors aren't gods that know everything there is to know about treating diseases. But a recent discussion on an MCL message board I frequent, seems to indicate that, at least a few out there still believe that to be the case.

One person stated

It is my opinion that the patient must choose a doctor after obtaining all information available and even checking with several doctors ---- then after choosing a doctor in whom the patient has confidence, he or she must then submit to that doctor's recommended treatment


Another says


The saying is that if you're going to be your own d[octor] you have an idiot for a patient. ... I was introduced to a young (32, who looked 22) doctor. I asked him his age and where he was from. I was in way to much trouble to shop around. ... I've never been sorry that I didn't take the time to shop for a second opinion.


Of course I have no objections to people believing and pursuing such courses of action, but those are individual decisions that must be made by each individual on his/her own. Advocating those beliefs as gospel for everyone is dangerous.

I sure don't believe that to be sound advice. I have never been of the belief that doctors are gods, and know everything about everything. And if there are such doctors they probably work at a university/research center, and see very few patients if any.

Most doctors/oncologists/hematologists have to deal with a myriad of different cancers, diseases etc. and to expect any doctor to keep up with all the latest research in every area is naive. The only way to ensure you are receiving the best possible care is to be proactive, and keep on top of all the latest advancements related to your disease, while at the same time keeping your doctors informed. Only then can you ever be sure that you are receiving the best possible care.

And with the advent of the internet, that job has never been easier.

There was one thing I learned at the first lymphoma conference I attended in LA, in 2002, shortly after my diagnosis, which I have never forgotten, and that was

NOBODY CARES MORE ABOUT YOU THAN YOU DO!


That goes for your spouse, your parents, your siblings, your doctor, and especially anyone on those message boards.

NOTE: I also posted this at my blog over at The Medical Blog Network, hoping to solicit views from doctors.

So far I have received one comment from Steve Beller, PhD which I found very interesting. It's a little long, but he does give some reasons to be concerned.

Comments

Becky said…
You're right. It's very important that you remain proactive and research your illness whatever it may be. A year or so ago I requested a bone density scan from my dr. He stated I was too youn. Then I mentioned a recent study on epileptics and the anti-convulstants they take causing early onset that I had read about on the internet. He vaguely remembered reading/hearing about it so he requested the test. He actually thanked me and said that he would make a note to recommend the test for another patient he had who had epilepsy.


Nobody loves me like I do :-)

Popular posts from this blog

My concerns reaffirmed today

When I was first diagnosed with MCL, I pretty much read just about everything I could get my hands on, I attended various conferences, and I talked to anyone who would listen. One of the most important lessons I learned, and which I've mentioned numerous times before was No one cares more about you than you. But in addition to that, I learned to fear the drug Doxorubicin , AKA Adriamycin, Doxil, Hydroxydoxorubicin, or more affectionately the Red Devil. Besides being a deadly chemical, as is the case with most chemotherapy drugs, it is one of the few chemotherapy drugs known to cause permanent heart damage. I even heard Dr. Sandra Horning , a noted Stanford lymphoma specialist, state at the first lymphoma conference I attended in LA, there was no evidence Doxorubicin provided any added benefit to chemotherapy protocols. This was music to my ears, since Doxorubicin is very common in most lymphoma treatment protocols. And even though Dr. Horning has since changed her tune [which my sk...

Bowling: A metaphor on life [sorta]

Over the past 15+ years the game of bowling has changed dramatically. Not only has the equipment changed, making it easier for bowlers of all ages and physical conditions to participate, and score well, but there have even been major advances to how the lanes are prepared for the start of bowling. No longer is it just heavy oil, light oil, long oil, short oil, or no oil, with the latest equipment, the amount of oil can be varied from front to back and side to side, producing a myriad of patterns designed to make the game more interesting, more challenging and as you might surmise, more frustrating. No longer does the "one ball fits all" approach work any more either. In order to navigate all the differing possible lane conditions, you need to have a varied selection of bowling balls. Most pros will tell you the average bowler needs 3 balls, plus a ball for spares, but to be an above average bowler you'll need at least 6 balls, with many possessing more than that. But just...

Fatigue! Part II - Maybe it is real?

Or it's actually Motivational Deficiency Disorder, MoDeD (pronounced Mo-Dee-Dee) for short. In a report this week by Roy Moynihan who reports for the British Medical Journal Austrailian scientists may have come across the reason for extreme laziness . The condition is claimed to affect up to one in five Australians and is characterised by overwhelming and debilitating apathy. Neuroscientists at the University of Newcastle in Australia say that in severe cases motivational deficiency disorder can be fatal, because the condition reduces the motivation to breathe. Neurologist Leth Argos is part of the team that has identified the disorder, which can be diagnosed using a combination of positron emission tomography and low scores on a motivation rating scale, previously validated in elite athletes. "This disorder is poorly understood," Professor Argos told the BMJ. "It is underdiagnosed and undertreated." Who knew? Maybe I have MoDeD, from my attempts to become a...