Skip to main content

Social Media IS the problem

To borrow a little something from Ronald Reagan, Social Media isn't the solution to our problems, Social Media is the problem!

I know this may sound eerily similar to my previous post, but because of some well deserved criticism, I feel compelled to issue a clarification of my position.

It isn't the internet or technology that I am against. There is no doubt the Internet has played an important role in society, even beyond its original intent of ensuring uninterrupted lines of communications for the military.

It's the Social Media applications that have spawned from the internet that I am against. it's the principle reason I dropped my Facebook account awhile back, and more recently my smartphone.  I believe [next to religion] Social Media is the biggest cause of the problems we are currently facing in this country today.

Because of Social Media, we spend less time interacting personally with each other, preferring such faceless applications as Facebook, Twitter and even blogs [guilty as charged] to express our thoughts. Even talking on the phone has declined as we switch more to texting and email.

Because of Social Media, we have become more detached from our fellow human beings, no longer interacting in ways that brought us closer together in the past. Instead we hide and retreat behind applications which make it so easy for us to ignore each other, and that which we don't want to be bothered with. We have relegated ourselves to our own little world(s) ignoring the problems and concerns of others, and rationalizing those problems away.

One of the biggest complaints about President Obama is that he doesn't try to engage his political opponents (as well as supporters) the same way Thomas Jefferson did while he was president. Some attribute that to aloofness. I attribute it to President Obama being a student [victim] of the Social Media age. An age where we don't know how to engage others, or are just afraid to, but instead prefer to engage others using the anonymity Social Media provides.

My conclusion, from yesterday's post, is still the same.

While the state of affairs in the US may not be exactly what it was in the days of Thomas Jefferson, we might all do well by taking a lesson from history. In the words of George Santayana, in his Reason in Common Sense, The Life of Reason, Vol.1,
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

We sure don't need things getting any worse about now!

Comments

Alan said…
You blame social media for a decline in people interacting with each other. You're a snob. What about all the people who are shy and/or have social phobias and without social media would have no social outlet
at all? There are more of those people than you know.

What about people with friends in foreign countries who can't afford phone calls to these countries. Social media has been a real boon.

I could go on.

Having said that, while I'm a member I'm no fan of Facebook.
Marc said…
And social media only serves to reinforce those phobias, preventing people from overcoming those fears. A far worse scenario, and potentially more dangerous.

As for long distant relationships, there is still email.

I stand by what I said. Social media does more harm good.
Mark VanKirk said…
I think that I still interact with everyone the same (If not more) than before Social Media. And, I have much more contact with friends and relatives that I would not have at (at all) before Social Media. For me, it has the opposite affect that you are describing.
Marc said…
There are no absolutes. Obviously there are exceptions to everything. You just happen to be one of them.
Mark VanKirk said…
I totally agree with you, I am exceptional!

Popular posts from this blog

Fatigue! Part II - Maybe it is real?

Or it's actually Motivational Deficiency Disorder, MoDeD (pronounced Mo-Dee-Dee) for short. In a report this week by Roy Moynihan who reports for the British Medical Journal Austrailian scientists may have come across the reason for extreme laziness . The condition is claimed to affect up to one in five Australians and is characterised by overwhelming and debilitating apathy. Neuroscientists at the University of Newcastle in Australia say that in severe cases motivational deficiency disorder can be fatal, because the condition reduces the motivation to breathe. Neurologist Leth Argos is part of the team that has identified the disorder, which can be diagnosed using a combination of positron emission tomography and low scores on a motivation rating scale, previously validated in elite athletes. "This disorder is poorly understood," Professor Argos told the BMJ. "It is underdiagnosed and undertreated." Who knew? Maybe I have MoDeD, from my attempts to become a...

My concerns reaffirmed today

When I was first diagnosed with MCL, I pretty much read just about everything I could get my hands on, I attended various conferences, and I talked to anyone who would listen. One of the most important lessons I learned, and which I've mentioned numerous times before was No one cares more about you than you. But in addition to that, I learned to fear the drug Doxorubicin , AKA Adriamycin, Doxil, Hydroxydoxorubicin, or more affectionately the Red Devil. Besides being a deadly chemical, as is the case with most chemotherapy drugs, it is one of the few chemotherapy drugs known to cause permanent heart damage. I even heard Dr. Sandra Horning , a noted Stanford lymphoma specialist, state at the first lymphoma conference I attended in LA, there was no evidence Doxorubicin provided any added benefit to chemotherapy protocols. This was music to my ears, since Doxorubicin is very common in most lymphoma treatment protocols. And even though Dr. Horning has since changed her tune [which my sk...

Tacitly condoning racism?

I learned something very discouraging in my current events class yesterday, there are a lot more racists and bigots out there then you may think. They may not admit it, or they'll claim otherwise, but when someone says they place the blame for what happened in Charlottesville on both sides, or better yet, they don't know where the blame lays, then they are condoning the action of the white supremacists groups, and in my book that is a racist/bigot. The truth is, there should be no doubt where blame for Charlottesville lays. It lays with the white supremacists, neo-Nazi's, KKK, etc, plain and simple! The hatred, bigotry, and misogyny displayed and espoused by these groups, coupled with the tacit approval of President Trump needs to be confronted at all cost, and history tells us so. If only the Jews, in pre-WWII Germany, had confronted the Nazi's in the same manner, Hitler might never have risen to power, and we would not be looking at the prospect of a  third anti...