Skip to main content

The limits of positive thinking

There's been some talk lately, on the various message boards, about what effect, if any, positive thinking plays in curing cancer. This topic has been discussed many times in the past, so I was surprised when both Karl, Lymphomation, and Chaya, CLL Topics, reposted on this subject in the same week. (I guess they're also running out of things to write about.)

So not to be out done, and since I don't believe I've ever addressed this topic before, I thought I'd get in on the action, and reiterate some of the ways I've approached dealing with cancer. It was either that, or posting about how doctors are to blame for emergency room overuse.)

Like most knowledgeable people, I am of the belief positive thinking is a good thing, it's just not going to cure your cancer.

Thinking positively will make you feel better, because going through life pissed off, and/or depressed all the time, doesn't do anyone any good (just trust me on that). That type of thinking is more likely to make you even sicker, at least from a mental standpoint, if not a physical one.

To cure your cancer, my best advice is go the conventional route. Listen to your oncologist/hematologist, but stay informed. Remember, doctors are only human. Don't over react when caution may be the more prudent approach. And don't be fooled by those who promise magical cures not supported by clinical evidence.

Most of all, have fun. Enjoy life (a lot easier said than done sometimes). Treat every day like it's your last, and remember what Brenda said to Nate when they first met,

The future is just a concept we use to avoid living today.


Oh and lastly, avoid Facebook, and I'm not talking about the stock (although I would avoid that as well). You don't have to be connected all the time. I guarantee you'll be a lot better off. It's been over a month since I suspended my Facebook account, and I haven't miss it one bit. I also think you'll find you have more time to do the things [exercise] you want and/or should be doing instead.
Labels:

Comments

Alan said…
I recently read a study (sorry don't remember where or the title) which studied this very question. The conclusion was that attitude made no difference in outcomes.

The danger of this common misconception is that for people who relapse, not only do they have to deal with that misfortune but have to deal with "failing" to have a positive enough attitude.
10:04 PM
Stephen Joyce said…
I completely agree with this. I have a go at the positive thinking industry in my blog. Feeling better by thinking positively is one thing, blaming the victim for not 'thinking' their cancer away is just sinister.

http://stephenjjoyce.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/its-not-all-about-you-thankfully/
3:38 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The results are in

And I am iron deficient, big time. [Which would account for my low hemoglobin] Test Result Ref Range IRON 30 59-158 mcg/dL TOTAL IRON BINDING CAPACITY 231 250-420 mcg/dL IRON SAT 13 20-50 % My Ferritin levels were good, but that could be because Ferritin is also an "acute phase reactant", that is sometimes increased with acute or chronic disease. Folate and B12 levels were also within the normal range. The only problem now is determining what is causing the iron deficiency, which in the case of men, is [very] rare. My oncologist has given me a Globin Fecal test to perform, and has scheduled me for a consultation with a colorectal surgeon to discuss performing a colonoscopy, which could be problematic because of my large spleen. In the mean time, I've decided to start taking an iron supplement, it's only the quantity that is causing me some consternation. I've been told by a very knowledgeable person that to overcome an iron deficiency, I need to be taking 300 mg o...
5 comments
Read more

Stop the stupidity!

Rural medical center (in Georgia) suspended from vaccination program after inoculating school district staff. Give me a break! Trying to get kids back to school, while protecting teachers, bus drivers and other staff, is exactly what school districts should be doing. If they have vaccines, give them out. We should be giving out vaccines to all who want them, whenever available. Trying to adhere to rigid guidelines will only result in fewer people getting vaccines, resulting in the discarding of precious vaccines, and less protection for everyone. Of course we should be giving first priority to healthcare workers, and any other essential public service employees, such as policeman, fireman, etc. first, but when they're not around to receive shots, or refuse shots, then give them to anyone willing to take them. What I would have objected to is the medical center trying to capitalize on the pandemic to make a profit, from giving vaccines to people far down the list of recipients, but ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When is enough, enough?

Today I learned, Lance Armstrong, the most drug tested athlete in the history of sport, is being accused of doping, again . This time by the US Anti Doping Agency (USADA), who claim they have collected blood samples from him in 2009 and 2010 that were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.” Really! What took them so long? The French have been trying to make allegations of drug doping stick for years, ever since he won his first Tour d'France, but to no avail. And now the USADA claims to have evidence to support that claim, and they've waited almost 3 years before releasing this evidence. Needless to say, I am skeptical. Then there's this from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO): Increasing the federal excise tax on cigarettes by 50 cents per pack eventually would increase Medicare and Social Security spending, slightly. Eventually? What is the CBO suggesting here? That we should encourage smoking, because if we don't, in...
11 comments
Read more