Skip to main content

Some things just boggle the mind

As if my experience with American Express wasn't bad enough, now I can't believe Verizon is just as intransigent.

Lately I've been having problems with my wireless connection. It seems anytime I get more than 10 feet away from the router, my internet connection fades out, and connectivity is hit or miss. Mostly miss.

So I contact Verizon, and discover my wireless connection is only guaranteed for 10 feet or line of sight from the router.

THAT'S RIDICULOUS!

What's the point of having a wireless connection, if you can't get a connection anywhere in the house. Besides this has only been a problem for the past one or two months. I never had a problem connecting before. Incidentally this is on 3 different computers (including a brand new MAC), so I know it's not a computer problem.

So anywaze, I contact Verizon, and I also discovered that the router is only warranted for one year.

SAY WHAT?

I never bought the router in the first place. It was included with the installation, which was free. But if I want another one, because this one is bad, it will cost $139 + tax.

What's even more amazing is, I'm only 5 days past the warranty. So you would think Verizon would cut me some slack, and send out a new one at no charge, just to be nice guys, but noooooooooo, that is not the case.

I could cancel the service, and then sign up again, and they'll install new service, including a new router, for no charge, costing them money and time. So why not just send me a new router, rather than piss off a valued customer.

That just was not to be. No amount of cajoling, begging, or even threatening to discontinue service would change anyone's mind (and I talked to 4 different people).

So I just got off the phone with Charter Cable, and they are coming to install my new cable internet service tomorrow. How's that for service?

And it's half the price of my Verizon FIOS for the first six months, with no minimum time commitment. So after 6 months if I'm not happy with Charter, I'll just switch back to Verizon.

I guess I'll just never understand big business.
Labels:

Comments

Becky said…
Okay first of all I had to look up intransigent. Good word, btw.

We have been having trouble with Verizon Fios and they could give a rats ass that our cable isn't working and apparently they are not going to credit me for the days we had no service.

Wasn't this part of your "Rollerball" theory?
3:46 AM
Marc said…
When there's no competition, that sort of strategy works fine, but in Long Beach, CA. I don't think so.

Of course I was probably talking to someone in India, who has no idea where Long Beach is.
4:13 AM
Susan C said…
I don't know how Verizon stays in business because their cell phone customer service is equally inexcusable. The average wait for service at their Pasadena store is 35 minutes.
7:21 AM
Marc said…
Well Susan, I hope you at least get decent service when you get to the front of the line.

I really can't complain about the Verizon customer service. I didn't wait very long for them to get to my issue, or even coming to the conclusion it was a modem/router issue, my complaint was with their final decision.

But even if I had to wait 35 minutes, I still would have been very happy had they just sent me a new modem/router.

I just don't think the cost of a new router to Verizon (I'm sure a lot less than the $140 they wanted to charge me), was too much to ask to keep a satisfied customer satisfied.

Especially since they'll lose more then their cost of a new modem, in the first two months they no longer have me as a paying customer.
8:47 AM
Mark VanKirk said…
My Verizon wireless router works great, but I would do the same thing you did if they gave me problems.

I nearly canceled my DirecTV for a similar reason. They wanted to charge me a $100 service charge to fix my DVR that I am leasing from them.
5:31 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The results are in

And I am iron deficient, big time. [Which would account for my low hemoglobin] Test Result Ref Range IRON 30 59-158 mcg/dL TOTAL IRON BINDING CAPACITY 231 250-420 mcg/dL IRON SAT 13 20-50 % My Ferritin levels were good, but that could be because Ferritin is also an "acute phase reactant", that is sometimes increased with acute or chronic disease. Folate and B12 levels were also within the normal range. The only problem now is determining what is causing the iron deficiency, which in the case of men, is [very] rare. My oncologist has given me a Globin Fecal test to perform, and has scheduled me for a consultation with a colorectal surgeon to discuss performing a colonoscopy, which could be problematic because of my large spleen. In the mean time, I've decided to start taking an iron supplement, it's only the quantity that is causing me some consternation. I've been told by a very knowledgeable person that to overcome an iron deficiency, I need to be taking 300 mg o...
5 comments
Read more

This is just one of those days

It's one of those days you just want to sit around the house and do absolutely nothing, or watch some movies you have recorded. It might even be a good day to read a book, if you were so inclined, which I am not. As you should be able to see from the view out my bedroom window, it is raining outside. The rain started last night, and hasn't let up since. I can't complain too much though, as this is the rainy season, and we do need the rain. Plus Monday's are typically my day off from exercise, so I will surprise everyone, and not complain. I just feel sorry for anyone who might be visiting from, say Argentina, like a friend of mine (fellow MCLer), who happens to be in Cambria today. He might be a little disappointed. Fortunately the rest of the week, when he will be in LA, will be nice, and the real intent of his trip was to visit his son in Tahoe, who works at one of the ski resorts, and ski, so I know he's not complaining too much either. This weather will actually...
6 comments
Read more

When is enough, enough?

Today I learned, Lance Armstrong, the most drug tested athlete in the history of sport, is being accused of doping, again . This time by the US Anti Doping Agency (USADA), who claim they have collected blood samples from him in 2009 and 2010 that were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.” Really! What took them so long? The French have been trying to make allegations of drug doping stick for years, ever since he won his first Tour d'France, but to no avail. And now the USADA claims to have evidence to support that claim, and they've waited almost 3 years before releasing this evidence. Needless to say, I am skeptical. Then there's this from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO): Increasing the federal excise tax on cigarettes by 50 cents per pack eventually would increase Medicare and Social Security spending, slightly. Eventually? What is the CBO suggesting here? That we should encourage smoking, because if we don't, in...
11 comments
Read more