Skip to main content

Distressing news on the cycling front

I just learned yesterday that Bjarne Riis, winner of the 1996 Tour d'France, admitted to using EPO from 1993 to 1998. And this comes after recent confessions by Erik Zabel and teammate Rolf Aldag for also using EPO.

Then there was Ivan Basso, winner of last years Giro d'Italia, and one of the team leaders on the Discovery Channel team, until he opted out of his contract after confessing to attempted doping.
Basso said he made contact with a doctor at the heart of the Spanish investigation, Eufemiano Fuentes, and gave him a blood sample with the intention of doping - but never actually did. .......

"It was a moment of weakness on my part," Basso said. "I accept responsibility and I am ready to face my punishment."

He still faces disciplinary action, and a likely suspension, regardless of his intentions.

As a cancer patient, I am keenly aware of the effects of EPO (having considered taking it myself due to a low hemoglobin count), as a performance enhancer, increasing the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood, so it isn't much of stretch to believe everyone is taking some performance enhancer in professional sports.  Heck there's even wide spread use among many amateur cyclists.

And what does this say about the allegations against Floyd Landis, and all the speculation surrounding Lance Armstrong?

At least the sport of cycling is trying to be up front with the problem, unlike a number of other sports.

Hopefully this will lead to either a cleaning up of the sport, or as Mark Cuban believes, a legalization of drugs not found to be detrimental to your health.

I'm just not sure who is going to be the arbiter for deciding what is not detrimental to ones health. Even EPO, while helping patients, also has some deleterious effects as well.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Becky said…
I don't fully understand how all this stuff works, but it seems to me that if you are to be judged on your physical abilities, doping seems to be cheating, because they wouldn't be doing something illegal it if they could perform on that level without it.

And while we're on the subject, can we get nudity back in the Olympics?
12:26 PM
Marc said…
Well that's correct, and that is why there are rules, but when there is so much money and notoriety involved, some people will do anything to gain an advantage.

Sometimes they get caught, but many times it seems they don't.

And I wouldn't object to nudity in the Olympics. Heck I might even try and qualify! :)
2:54 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

History IS repeating itself

I didn't grow up during the rise and fall of Hitler and Nazi Germany, so for me to claim it feels like those are the times we are living in now, must be taken with a grain of salt. But I have seen enough movies, and read enough history to know, if the times we're living in now are not akin to the rise of a Nazism and Facism in Europe in the 1930's and 1940's, then we're not far off. If you can't see the parallels with Nazi Germany, then you must be living in a different country than me. Republicans and other right wing extremists will stop at nothing to subvert the will of the majority, forcing their beliefs, that they are the superior race and have been appointed by God, to impose their will on America, while they blame all our problems on immigrants, blacks and Jews. As I speak, Mitch McConnell, and his minions are raising roadblocks to all legislation designed to help average Americans under the guise of fiscal responsibility. They condone violent and verba...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vaccine Mandates, what are they good for?

Not much, that's for sure! Simply showing evidence of receiving a Covid-19 vaccine (whether fake or not), does not mean you are protected from getting Covid-19, nor spreading it, if infected. We are all different, and too many of us, i.e. people who are immunocompromised/ immunosupressed, the elderly, or others for various reasons, do not [cannot] mount an immune response as good as younger and healthier individuals. What is evidence of immunity is a quantitative antibody test showing you have developed antibodies, and to what degree, either from natural immunity or the vaccine.  That is what we should be testing for. That is what is important. But for too long, many, i.e. the FDA, doctors, and other health experts discouraged people (and still are) from getting antibody tests, because there was little knowledge about what level of antibodies are needed to impart immunity to the virus. That of course is true, to some extent, but how can we ever find out [learn] the a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Open letter to all Democrats

Stop the nonsense! Continuing to go after Trump, without any hope of getting a conviction, does nothing more than provide Republicans with an obstructionist dialogue (now that they have come up with the unconstitutional talking point) in addition to giving Trump much needed publicity, when we should be ignoring him. It's the pure definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result! Instead Democrats need to be laser focused on what is important to all Americans, i.e. healthcare, Social Security and Medicare, infrastructure reform, the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, to name just a few. And when you do talk about Trump, simply steer the conversation as to how the Trump administration botched everything, how Trump is responsible for the deaths of 400,000+ Americans, due to his inaction and the down playing of the pandemic, plus the deaths of 2 Capitol policeman during the insurrection Trump provoked and incited on January 6, 2021. ...
Post a Comment
Read more