Skip to main content

The results are in!

And they're not encouraging, at least not from my stand point.

Of 40 votes cast (which is another disappointment), in the poll I posted on October 20, 2006, 25 people believe health care should be treated as a commodity, and only distributed to those who can pay.

The results would be even more disheartening, if I truly thought they were representative of US society as a whole. I don't believe that to be the case.

I refuse to accept that anyone, with the exception of maybe Rush Limbaugh, who thinks Michael J. Fox is faking his disease, and maybe a few others, has so little compassion for their fellow man, and is so self centered, they would put health care on the same plain as purchasing a car.

Of course when you combine this with the fact that daylight savings time is over, and winter is upon us, the Steelers lost to the Oakland Raiders, and Mercury is in retrograde, it can be a little discouraging!

Comments

John Wagner said…
Any possibility of "ballot stuffing?" I find it hard to believe also. I guess the majority of your readers believe in survival of the richest. Sad.
Marc said…
No, I refuse to accept the possibility of ballot stuffing. Not even the lowest of low would stoop to stuffing the ballot box, on such an inconsequential blog as mine. :)

From what I've seen, most people who frequent blogs a lot tend to lean toward the conservative side on issues, and promote the philosophy that everyone should take responsibility for their own actions.

As if we had any control over our illnesses.

(The more socially conscience among us tend to have better things to do with their time.)

They also think that everyone in the country could pay for their own health care, if they just worked hard, and didn't waste all their paying for food, rent and cars to get to work.

Somehow they just forgot about the concept that for every winner, there has to be a loser.

I guess in this case, the socially conscious lost!

Popular posts from this blog

The green tea phenomenon

Despite being a heavy drinker of green tea since my diagnosis, mainly for its cancer prevention, and hopefully cancer curing qualities, I recently have developed a new found enthusiasm for green tea. Now whether it has been the green tea I have been drinking for the past 6+ years, my heavy exercise routine, or just pure chance that has kept my MCL stable, or at least [very] slow progressing, for the past 7+ years is certainly open to debate, but based on past research, I have chosen to believe green tea has at least helped to some degree. So what has given me this new found enthusiasm? Well, a friend of mine, and cycling buddy, was recently diagnosed with bladder cancer, and knowing my daily regimen called to ask my advice on green tea. He had already done a lot of research on the subject, so when I told him my obsession with green tea consisted principally of drinking the least expensive, decaffeinated green tea available (Trader Joe's brand of 18 tea bags for $3, and more recentl...

Alternative treatment blowback

I received some interesting criticism the other day for my stance on alternative therapies. I ......... cannot for the life of me understand why you would not use supplementation and then use an over the counter poisonous liquid which has proven liver toxicity. Especially while taking a statin. She was referring to the use of an over the counter cough medication, I have been taking to help ease the symptoms of my upper respiratory infection. I did this once and vow to never use it again! I have gotten off Lipitor by using Nicotinic Acid and getting much better results but still use COQ10 to protect Liver as you must do while taking Statins. If you are not using CoQ10, I urge you to research this issue. MCL reduces your D3 and should be taken everyday! I use 5000mgs a day. I was sorta taken aback. She was partially correct. I'm against taking supplements, but when necessary I don't have a problem taking over the counter medication, when my ailments finally get the better of me. ...

When is enough, enough?

Today I learned, Lance Armstrong, the most drug tested athlete in the history of sport, is being accused of doping, again . This time by the US Anti Doping Agency (USADA), who claim they have collected blood samples from him in 2009 and 2010 that were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.” Really! What took them so long? The French have been trying to make allegations of drug doping stick for years, ever since he won his first Tour d'France, but to no avail. And now the USADA claims to have evidence to support that claim, and they've waited almost 3 years before releasing this evidence. Needless to say, I am skeptical. Then there's this from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO): Increasing the federal excise tax on cigarettes by 50 cents per pack eventually would increase Medicare and Social Security spending, slightly. Eventually? What is the CBO suggesting here? That we should encourage smoking, because if we don't, in...