Skip to main content

Doctors

As you know, my first oncologist at Kaiser, decided to move to Corpus Christi, TX, to be close to his family. I was devastated. I had spent the better part of 3 years training him about mantle cell lymphoma, and developing a great rapport with him. He was even willing to authorize the initial treatment that I wanted, which was Rituxan alone.

I was very comfortable and content.

Unfortunately life is never fair, and last March I was forced to choose another oncologist. I chose one against the advice of one the nurses I respected a lot at Kaiser, and now I am wondering why I did that.

Just last week I had my usual blood test, and as normal, his [my new oncologist] nurse called relatively promptly with the results. This time was a little different because I forgot to ask what my platelet count was. (The platelets along with my hemoglobin, are two things I watch even more closely than my lymphocyte count, as I have been told that a reduction in platelets is the first sign of bone marrow failure.)

So I had to get in contact with the doctor again to get the results, but rather than call, I decided to email the doctor, hoping that would be faster. Surprisingly he responded fairly quickly, but with an extremely short and incorrect response.

WBC 98.4

Remember, I asked for my platelet count. So I wrote back again, explaining that I already had the WBC count, but needed the platelet count. Again he responded fairly quickly with the following response.


Hb - 12.9, platelets - 96


I was shocked, to say the least. My platelet count was 235 last month, and now it dropped to 96! In my mind, that meant I had best start treatment now, and I would have hoped that it would have sparked the same concern in my oncologists mind. But it didn't!

After I calmed down I realized that my lymphocyte percentage was 96 also, and suspected that my oncologist, being in a hurry, made an error. I immediately wrote him back, expressing concern that after reporting a platelet count of 96, he didn't think treatment was immediately necessary, while also pointing out that he may have copied the wrong result.

Eventually I got the correct result (224), which is well within the normal range (140 - 400), and about where it has been for the last 4 years.

Still it seems he could have paid a little closer attention, plus he didn't even apologize for the error. If he'd only spent a few extra seconds reading my email, and thinking about his response, he could have saved himself a lot of extra time.

He seems like a nice guy, and does review the various reports I do give him on MCL i.e. treatments etc. with interest, but now I am just not sure how responsive he will be to my needs. Does he really have concern for his patients, or is this simply a job to him?

I guess I'd better go back and talk to that nurse again about what to do.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My concerns reaffirmed today

When I was first diagnosed with MCL, I pretty much read just about everything I could get my hands on, I attended various conferences, and I talked to anyone who would listen. One of the most important lessons I learned, and which I've mentioned numerous times before was No one cares more about you than you. But in addition to that, I learned to fear the drug Doxorubicin , AKA Adriamycin, Doxil, Hydroxydoxorubicin, or more affectionately the Red Devil. Besides being a deadly chemical, as is the case with most chemotherapy drugs, it is one of the few chemotherapy drugs known to cause permanent heart damage. I even heard Dr. Sandra Horning , a noted Stanford lymphoma specialist, state at the first lymphoma conference I attended in LA, there was no evidence Doxorubicin provided any added benefit to chemotherapy protocols. This was music to my ears, since Doxorubicin is very common in most lymphoma treatment protocols. And even though Dr. Horning has since changed her tune [which my sk...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bowling: A metaphor on life [sorta]

Over the past 15+ years the game of bowling has changed dramatically. Not only has the equipment changed, making it easier for bowlers of all ages and physical conditions to participate, and score well, but there have even been major advances to how the lanes are prepared for the start of bowling. No longer is it just heavy oil, light oil, long oil, short oil, or no oil, with the latest equipment, the amount of oil can be varied from front to back and side to side, producing a myriad of patterns designed to make the game more interesting, more challenging and as you might surmise, more frustrating. No longer does the "one ball fits all" approach work any more either. In order to navigate all the differing possible lane conditions, you need to have a varied selection of bowling balls. Most pros will tell you the average bowler needs 3 balls, plus a ball for spares, but to be an above average bowler you'll need at least 6 balls, with many possessing more than that. But just...
1 comment
Read more

Fatigue! Part II - Maybe it is real?

Or it's actually Motivational Deficiency Disorder, MoDeD (pronounced Mo-Dee-Dee) for short. In a report this week by Roy Moynihan who reports for the British Medical Journal Austrailian scientists may have come across the reason for extreme laziness . The condition is claimed to affect up to one in five Australians and is characterised by overwhelming and debilitating apathy. Neuroscientists at the University of Newcastle in Australia say that in severe cases motivational deficiency disorder can be fatal, because the condition reduces the motivation to breathe. Neurologist Leth Argos is part of the team that has identified the disorder, which can be diagnosed using a combination of positron emission tomography and low scores on a motivation rating scale, previously validated in elite athletes. "This disorder is poorly understood," Professor Argos told the BMJ. "It is underdiagnosed and undertreated." Who knew? Maybe I have MoDeD, from my attempts to become a...
Post a Comment
Read more