Skip to main content

Doctors

As you know, my first oncologist at Kaiser, decided to move to Corpus Christi, TX, to be close to his family. I was devastated. I had spent the better part of 3 years training him about mantle cell lymphoma, and developing a great rapport with him. He was even willing to authorize the initial treatment that I wanted, which was Rituxan alone.

I was very comfortable and content.

Unfortunately life is never fair, and last March I was forced to choose another oncologist. I chose one against the advice of one the nurses I respected a lot at Kaiser, and now I am wondering why I did that.

Just last week I had my usual blood test, and as normal, his [my new oncologist] nurse called relatively promptly with the results. This time was a little different because I forgot to ask what my platelet count was. (The platelets along with my hemoglobin, are two things I watch even more closely than my lymphocyte count, as I have been told that a reduction in platelets is the first sign of bone marrow failure.)

So I had to get in contact with the doctor again to get the results, but rather than call, I decided to email the doctor, hoping that would be faster. Surprisingly he responded fairly quickly, but with an extremely short and incorrect response.

WBC 98.4

Remember, I asked for my platelet count. So I wrote back again, explaining that I already had the WBC count, but needed the platelet count. Again he responded fairly quickly with the following response.


Hb - 12.9, platelets - 96


I was shocked, to say the least. My platelet count was 235 last month, and now it dropped to 96! In my mind, that meant I had best start treatment now, and I would have hoped that it would have sparked the same concern in my oncologists mind. But it didn't!

After I calmed down I realized that my lymphocyte percentage was 96 also, and suspected that my oncologist, being in a hurry, made an error. I immediately wrote him back, expressing concern that after reporting a platelet count of 96, he didn't think treatment was immediately necessary, while also pointing out that he may have copied the wrong result.

Eventually I got the correct result (224), which is well within the normal range (140 - 400), and about where it has been for the last 4 years.

Still it seems he could have paid a little closer attention, plus he didn't even apologize for the error. If he'd only spent a few extra seconds reading my email, and thinking about his response, he could have saved himself a lot of extra time.

He seems like a nice guy, and does review the various reports I do give him on MCL i.e. treatments etc. with interest, but now I am just not sure how responsive he will be to my needs. Does he really have concern for his patients, or is this simply a job to him?

I guess I'd better go back and talk to that nurse again about what to do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The results are in

And I am iron deficient, big time. [Which would account for my low hemoglobin] Test Result Ref Range IRON 30 59-158 mcg/dL TOTAL IRON BINDING CAPACITY 231 250-420 mcg/dL IRON SAT 13 20-50 % My Ferritin levels were good, but that could be because Ferritin is also an "acute phase reactant", that is sometimes increased with acute or chronic disease. Folate and B12 levels were also within the normal range. The only problem now is determining what is causing the iron deficiency, which in the case of men, is [very] rare. My oncologist has given me a Globin Fecal test to perform, and has scheduled me for a consultation with a colorectal surgeon to discuss performing a colonoscopy, which could be problematic because of my large spleen. In the mean time, I've decided to start taking an iron supplement, it's only the quantity that is causing me some consternation. I've been told by a very knowledgeable person that to overcome an iron deficiency, I need to be taking 300 mg o...

This is just one of those days

It's one of those days you just want to sit around the house and do absolutely nothing, or watch some movies you have recorded. It might even be a good day to read a book, if you were so inclined, which I am not. As you should be able to see from the view out my bedroom window, it is raining outside. The rain started last night, and hasn't let up since. I can't complain too much though, as this is the rainy season, and we do need the rain. Plus Monday's are typically my day off from exercise, so I will surprise everyone, and not complain. I just feel sorry for anyone who might be visiting from, say Argentina, like a friend of mine (fellow MCLer), who happens to be in Cambria today. He might be a little disappointed. Fortunately the rest of the week, when he will be in LA, will be nice, and the real intent of his trip was to visit his son in Tahoe, who works at one of the ski resorts, and ski, so I know he's not complaining too much either. This weather will actually...

Stop the stupidity!

Rural medical center (in Georgia) suspended from vaccination program after inoculating school district staff. Give me a break! Trying to get kids back to school, while protecting teachers, bus drivers and other staff, is exactly what school districts should be doing. If they have vaccines, give them out. We should be giving out vaccines to all who want them, whenever available. Trying to adhere to rigid guidelines will only result in fewer people getting vaccines, resulting in the discarding of precious vaccines, and less protection for everyone. Of course we should be giving first priority to healthcare workers, and any other essential public service employees, such as policeman, fireman, etc. first, but when they're not around to receive shots, or refuse shots, then give them to anyone willing to take them. What I would have objected to is the medical center trying to capitalize on the pandemic to make a profit, from giving vaccines to people far down the list of recipients, but ...